Upload your contract
Automatically highlight indemnities, liability caps, termination traps, unilateral rights, and missing protections. Export structured findings for redlines and approvals.
From lengthy agreements to prioritized issues and next steps — in minutes.
Upload a contract. We analyze clause language and context to score risk and produce clear summaries.
Step one: upload DOCX or PDF agreements — we normalize scanned pages, split sections, and prepare text for analysis.
Step two: identify risk‑bearing clauses (liability, indemnity, warranty, IP, confidentiality, governing law) and exceptions against playbooks.
Step three: export a prioritized issue list, suggested mitigations, and a concise summary for business stakeholders.
Contract risk analysis also considers negotiation context such as counterparty type, jurisdiction, and industry‑specific obligations to avoid false positives.
Each finding is scored on likelihood and impact to produce a clear heat‑map of exposure, so reviewers know exactly where to focus first.
Issues are linked to practical mitigations — fallback language, commercial concessions, or operational controls — to help teams close gaps, not just spot them.
At the portfolio level, contract risk analysis tracks trends like time‑to‑close, exception rates, and indemnity exposure so leaders can reduce risk over time.
Upload contracts individually or in bulk. Support for DOCX, PDF, and scans.
Risk scoring across key clauses with explanations, references, and confidence.
Issue lists, executive summaries, and exportable data for redlines and approvals.
Teams reduce review cycles while improving risk visibility.
“We now walk into negotiations with a risk digest in hand — it’s a game changer.”
“Our executives finally get a concise view of exposure without reading every page.”
Focus your time where it matters. Automated scoring and explanations spotlight what needs review first.
Consistent outputs let legal ops build reliable workflows — from intake to approvals and renewals.
Map findings to your playbooks and preferred terms to standardize negotiations.
Share concise executive summaries that translate legal nuance into clear business impact.
Integrate structured results into CLM systems, ticketing, and reporting for visibility.
Scale coverage without sacrificing quality — even during volume spikes.
Immediate view of what’s blocking, what’s risky, and what’s acceptable.
Standard fields across agreements for faster comparisons and reporting.
Security, controls, and reliability that scale with demand.
Answers to common questions about risk scoring, issue detection, and summaries.
We flag indemnity scope, liability caps, termination rights, unilateral change provisions, warranty limitations, IP ownership, confidentiality carve‑outs, and more.
Scoring considers clause language, context, and alignment to your playbooks. Each score includes a rationale and references.
Yes. We normalize scans and multi‑page documents for robust analysis.
Export issue lists and summaries to CSV/JSON, or integrate with CLM and ticketing.
Yes. Findings are linked to recommended actions such as fallback language, commercial concessions, or operational controls to reduce exposure.
The analyzer supports multiple jurisdictions and common contract languages. Jurisdiction‑specific rules are applied during scoring when configured.
Assign owners to issues, track status, and add comments or internal notes. Activity is captured in immutable audit logs.
Trend reports include exception rates, time‑to‑close, clause variance, and indemnity exposure by portfolio. Export data to BI tools via CSV/JSON.
Encryption, access controls, and optional zero‑retention keep sensitive data protected.
All uploads travel over secure connections and are stored with strong encryption. Short‑lived processing minimizes exposure.
Role‑based permissions, audit trails, and SSO/SAML support align with enterprise requirements.
Configure regional data residency and retention policies to match your compliance posture.
TLS in transit and AES‑256 at rest for documents and outputs.
Team‑level permissions and immutable audit logs for every action.
Configurable retention policies including zero‑retention modes.
Data residency choices to meet jurisdictional needs.
Risk analysis turns long agreements into a prioritized list of issues with reasons and owners. Instead of hunting for every clause, reviewers see the few items that warrant attention—renewal windows, missing carve‑outs, caps out of range, or governing‑law problems—each with a short rationale and a link to the source text.
Keep scores simple and transparent. Each item carries a likelihood and impact plus a one‑line reason (e.g., “renewal notice < 30 days; policy requires ≥60”). Use scores to sort, not to replace judgment. Dismissals and edits feed back into evaluation so noisy checks get tuned or retired.
Every exception includes: the policy it violates, a short explanation, and a suggested fallback or negotiation note. That tiny format is what gets adoption from sales, procurement, and execs—it’s obvious what happened and what to do next.
A one‑click triage control turns review into training data. Track precision/recall for the main checks and publish the numbers, especially for tricky clauses (liability vs. disclaimer). Confidence grows when people can see where the system is strong—and where it needs a human.
Move beyond single documents to cohorts: region, product, size, or counterparty. Leaders want to see exposure shrinking over time: fewer high‑risk exceptions, fewer missed renewals, and faster approvals. Dashboards should highlight trends, not drown people in counts.
Push high‑risk items into ticketing with owners and due dates; wire approvals into CLM; sync fields to your warehouse for audits. A small “exceptions closed” trend is the cleanest proof the process is working.
Use encryption in transit/at rest, short‑lived processing, role‑based access, audit logs, regional residency, and retention controls. Provide a “view source” link for every risk item so auditors can trace findings to the exact lines.
0–30: Define five must‑catch checks and measure precision/recall on a 100‑contract pilot. 31–60: Add exception reasons, connect ticketing, and start weekly labeling. 61–90: Go live, publish a small dashboard, and expand to one more doc type.
Jan 14, 2026
The limitation of liability clause is the line between a manageable hiccup and a serious hit to the business. Caps, carve-outs, and excluded damages (like indirect, consequential, or lost profits) dec...
Read more →Jan 13, 2026
Non-compete agreements are getting a lot of heat right now. Between the FTC’s 2024 rule and a maze of state laws, it’s hard to know what’s safe and what’s going to cause headaches later. So, can AI au...
Read more →Jan 12, 2026
If your renewals, notice windows, and deliverables are scattered across spreadsheets and inboxes, you’re probably bleeding money and inviting last‑minute chaos.The upside: modern AI can read your cont...
Read more →